Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Surveyors Salary: Indiana vs Washington

Surveyors earn a median of $81,010 in Indiana and $88,340 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $7,330 (-8.3%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$81,010
Indiana median
$86,800 after COL
$88,340
Washington median
$82,551 after COL
-8.3%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+5.1%
Adjusted gap
Indiana leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $7,330 more per year than Indiana for surveyors, a gap of +8.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Indiana actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $4,250 more in national-price-level terms (a +5.1% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for surveyors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Surveyors

Indiana

Median salary
$81,010
Mean salary
$82,840
Employment
1,000
Location quotient
0.91
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$86,800
Regional Price Parity
93.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Surveyors page for Indiana →

Surveyors

Washington

Median salary
$88,340
Mean salary
$93,850
Employment
800
Location quotient
0.65
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$82,551
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Surveyors page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into surveyors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.