Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Tax Preparers Salary: Alabama vs Alaska

Tax Preparers earn a median of $33,490 in Alabama and $77,010 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $43,520 (-56.5%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$33,490
Alabama median
$37,704 after COL
$77,010
Alaska median
$75,235 after COL
-56.5%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
-49.9%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $43,520 more per year than Alabama for tax preparers, a gap of +56.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $37,531 of extra purchasing power (+49.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tax preparers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tax Preparers

Alabama

Median salary
$33,490
Mean salary
$34,250
Employment
550
Location quotient
0.55
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$37,704
Regional Price Parity
88.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tax Preparers page for Alabama →

Tax Preparers

Alaska

Median salary
$77,010
Mean salary
$71,990
Employment
80
Location quotient
0.55
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$75,235
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tax Preparers page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into tax preparers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.