Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Tax Preparers Salary: Minnesota vs Montana

Tax Preparers earn a median of $65,530 in Minnesota and $71,370 in Montana. That is a nominal gap of $5,840 (-8.2%), with Montana paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$65,530
Minnesota median
$66,446 after COL
$71,370
Montana median
$75,408 after COL
-8.2%
Nominal gap
Montana leads
-11.9%
Adjusted gap
Montana leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Montana pays $5,840 more per year than Minnesota for tax preparers, a gap of +8.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Montana still comes out ahead, with roughly $8,962 of extra purchasing power (+11.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tax preparers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tax Preparers

Minnesota

Median salary
$65,530
Mean salary
$73,290
Employment
1,330
Location quotient
0.95
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$66,446
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tax Preparers page for Minnesota →

Tax Preparers

Montana

Median salary
$71,370
Mean salary
$73,270
Employment
340
Location quotient
1.41
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$75,408
Regional Price Parity
94.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tax Preparers page for Montana →

Related pages

Keep digging into tax preparers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.