Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Tax Preparers Salary: Wichita, KS vs St. Cloud, MN

Tax Preparers earn a median of $43,720 in Wichita, KS and $73,550 in St. Cloud, MN. That is a nominal gap of $29,830 (-40.6%), with St. Cloud, MN paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$43,720
Wichita, KS median
$49,153 after COL
$73,550
St. Cloud, MN median
$83,931 after COL
-40.6%
Nominal gap
St. Cloud, MN leads
-41.4%
Adjusted gap
St. Cloud, MN leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, St. Cloud, MN pays $29,830 more per year than Wichita, KS for tax preparers, a gap of +40.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, St. Cloud, MN still comes out ahead, with roughly $34,777 of extra purchasing power (+41.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tax preparers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tax Preparers

Wichita, KS

Median salary
$43,720
Mean salary
$52,190
Employment
140
Location quotient
0.96
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$49,153
Regional Price Parity
88.9%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Tax Preparers page for Wichita, KS →

Tax Preparers

St. Cloud, MN

Median salary
$73,550
Mean salary
$75,810
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.78
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$83,931
Regional Price Parity
87.6%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Tax Preparers page for St. Cloud, MN →

Related pages

Keep digging into tax preparers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.