Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Technical Writers Salary: New Jersey vs Massachusetts

Technical Writers earn a median of $86,990 in New Jersey and $102,640 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $15,650 (-15.2%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$86,990
New Jersey median
$79,950 after COL
$102,640
Massachusetts median
$97,053 after COL
-15.2%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
-17.6%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $15,650 more per year than New Jersey for technical writers, a gap of +15.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Massachusetts still comes out ahead, with roughly $17,102 of extra purchasing power (+17.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for technical writers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Technical Writers

New Jersey

Median salary
$86,990
Mean salary
$95,170
Employment
1,350
Location quotient
0.88
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$79,950
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Technical Writers page for New Jersey →

Technical Writers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$102,640
Mean salary
$106,090
Employment
1,750
Location quotient
1.34
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$97,053
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Technical Writers page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into technical writers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.