Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Tellers Salary: Anniston-Oxford, AL vs New Haven, CT

Tellers earn a median of $35,510 in Anniston-Oxford, AL and $47,780 in New Haven, CT. That is a nominal gap of $12,270 (-25.7%), with New Haven, CT paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$35,510
Anniston-Oxford, AL median
$41,315 after COL
$47,780
New Haven, CT median
$45,697 after COL
-25.7%
Nominal gap
New Haven, CT leads
-9.6%
Adjusted gap
New Haven, CT leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Haven, CT pays $12,270 more per year than Anniston-Oxford, AL for tellers, a gap of +25.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Haven, CT still comes out ahead, with roughly $4,381 of extra purchasing power (+9.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tellers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tellers

Anniston-Oxford, AL

Median salary
$35,510
Mean salary
$34,590
Employment
150
Location quotient
1.59
Jobs per 1,000
3.5
COL-adjusted median
$41,315
Regional Price Parity
85.9%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Tellers page for Anniston-Oxford, AL →

Tellers

New Haven, CT

Median salary
$47,780
Mean salary
$46,150
Employment
540
Location quotient
0.86
Jobs per 1,000
1.9
COL-adjusted median
$45,697
Regional Price Parity
104.6%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Tellers page for New Haven, CT →

Related pages

Keep digging into tellers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.