Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Terrazzo Workers And Finishers Salary: Texas vs Illinois

Terrazzo Workers And Finishers earn a median of $50,190 in Texas and $104,510 in Illinois. That is a nominal gap of $54,320 (-52.0%), with Illinois paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$50,190
Texas median
$51,712 after COL
$104,510
Illinois median
$104,554 after COL
-52.0%
Nominal gap
Illinois leads
-50.5%
Adjusted gap
Illinois leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Illinois pays $54,320 more per year than Texas for terrazzo workers and finishers, a gap of +52.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Illinois still comes out ahead, with roughly $52,842 of extra purchasing power (+50.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for terrazzo workers and finishers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Terrazzo Workers And Finishers

Texas

Median salary
$50,190
Mean salary
$49,140
Employment
70
Location quotient
0.53
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$51,712
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Terrazzo Workers And Finishers page for Texas →

Terrazzo Workers And Finishers

Illinois

Median salary
$104,510
Mean salary
$88,580
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$104,554
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Terrazzo Workers And Finishers page for Illinois →

Related pages

Keep digging into terrazzo workers and finishers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.