Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Tile And Stone Setters Salary: Vermont vs Hawaii

Tile And Stone Setters earn a median of $60,320 in Vermont and $96,080 in Hawaii. That is a nominal gap of $35,760 (-37.2%), with Hawaii paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$60,320
Vermont median
$61,577 after COL
$96,080
Hawaii median
$87,384 after COL
-37.2%
Nominal gap
Hawaii leads
-29.5%
Adjusted gap
Hawaii leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Hawaii pays $35,760 more per year than Vermont for tile and stone setters, a gap of +37.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Hawaii still comes out ahead, with roughly $25,807 of extra purchasing power (+29.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tile and stone setters in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tile And Stone Setters

Vermont

Median salary
$60,320
Mean salary
$57,810
Employment
100
Location quotient
1.26
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$61,577
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tile And Stone Setters page for Vermont →

Tile And Stone Setters

Hawaii

Median salary
$96,080
Mean salary
$96,590
Employment
550
Location quotient
3.50
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$87,384
Regional Price Parity
110.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tile And Stone Setters page for Hawaii →

Related pages

Keep digging into tile and stone setters from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.