Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Tile And Stone Setters Salary: Washington vs Maine

Tile And Stone Setters earn a median of $62,210 in Washington and $68,470 in Maine. That is a nominal gap of $6,260 (-9.1%), with Maine paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$62,210
Washington median
$58,133 after COL
$68,470
Maine median
$70,551 after COL
-9.1%
Nominal gap
Maine leads
-17.6%
Adjusted gap
Maine leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Maine pays $6,260 more per year than Washington for tile and stone setters, a gap of +9.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Maine still comes out ahead, with roughly $12,418 of extra purchasing power (+17.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tile and stone setters in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tile And Stone Setters

Washington

Median salary
$62,210
Mean salary
$69,510
Employment
1,030
Location quotient
1.16
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$58,133
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tile And Stone Setters page for Washington →

Tile And Stone Setters

Maine

Median salary
$68,470
Mean salary
$67,990
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$70,551
Regional Price Parity
97.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tile And Stone Setters page for Maine →

Related pages

Keep digging into tile and stone setters from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.