Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Tire Repairers And Changers Salary: Richmond, VA vs Napa, CA

Tire Repairers And Changers earn a median of $31,710 in Richmond, VA and $51,600 in Napa, CA. That is a nominal gap of $19,890 (-38.5%), with Napa, CA paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$31,710
Richmond, VA median
$32,404 after COL
$51,600
Napa, CA median
$45,845 after COL
-38.5%
Nominal gap
Napa, CA leads
-29.3%
Adjusted gap
Napa, CA leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Napa, CA pays $19,890 more per year than Richmond, VA for tire repairers and changers, a gap of +38.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Napa, CA still comes out ahead, with roughly $13,441 of extra purchasing power (+29.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tire repairers and changers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tire Repairers And Changers

Richmond, VA

Median salary
$31,710
Mean salary
$35,790
Employment
590
Location quotient
1.30
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$32,404
Regional Price Parity
97.9%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Tire Repairers And Changers page for Richmond, VA →

Tire Repairers And Changers

Napa, CA

Median salary
$51,600
Mean salary
$50,950
Employment
50
Location quotient
0.86
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$45,845
Regional Price Parity
112.6%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Tire Repairers And Changers page for Napa, CA →

Related pages

Keep digging into tire repairers and changers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.