Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Tire Repairers And Changers Salary: Vermont vs Rhode Island

Tire Repairers And Changers earn a median of $38,730 in Vermont and $45,370 in Rhode Island. That is a nominal gap of $6,640 (-14.6%), with Rhode Island paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$38,730
Vermont median
$39,537 after COL
$45,370
Rhode Island median
$44,359 after COL
-14.6%
Nominal gap
Rhode Island leads
-10.9%
Adjusted gap
Rhode Island leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Rhode Island pays $6,640 more per year than Vermont for tire repairers and changers, a gap of +14.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Rhode Island still comes out ahead, with roughly $4,821 of extra purchasing power (+10.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tire repairers and changers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tire Repairers And Changers

Vermont

Median salary
$38,730
Mean salary
$39,280
Employment
110
Location quotient
0.52
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$39,537
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tire Repairers And Changers page for Vermont →

Tire Repairers And Changers

Rhode Island

Median salary
$45,370
Mean salary
$44,990
Employment
230
Location quotient
0.66
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$44,359
Regional Price Parity
102.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tire Repairers And Changers page for Rhode Island →

Related pages

Keep digging into tire repairers and changers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.