Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Tool And Die Makers Salary: Georgia vs Kansas

Tool And Die Makers earn a median of $61,260 in Georgia and $81,230 in Kansas. That is a nominal gap of $19,970 (-24.6%), with Kansas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$61,260
Georgia median
$63,618 after COL
$81,230
Kansas median
$90,187 after COL
-24.6%
Nominal gap
Kansas leads
-29.5%
Adjusted gap
Kansas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Kansas pays $19,970 more per year than Georgia for tool and die makers, a gap of +24.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Kansas still comes out ahead, with roughly $26,569 of extra purchasing power (+29.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tool and die makers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tool And Die Makers

Georgia

Median salary
$61,260
Mean salary
$62,310
Employment
760
Location quotient
0.44
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$63,618
Regional Price Parity
96.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tool And Die Makers page for Georgia →

Tool And Die Makers

Kansas

Median salary
$81,230
Mean salary
$72,310
Employment
750
Location quotient
1.46
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$90,187
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tool And Die Makers page for Kansas →

Related pages

Keep digging into tool and die makers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.