Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Tool And Die Makers Salary: Wisconsin vs Maine

Tool And Die Makers earn a median of $65,850 in Wisconsin and $76,500 in Maine. That is a nominal gap of $10,650 (-13.9%), with Maine paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$65,850
Wisconsin median
$69,982 after COL
$76,500
Maine median
$78,825 after COL
-13.9%
Nominal gap
Maine leads
-11.2%
Adjusted gap
Maine leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Maine pays $10,650 more per year than Wisconsin for tool and die makers, a gap of +13.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Maine still comes out ahead, with roughly $8,843 of extra purchasing power (+11.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tool and die makers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tool And Die Makers

Wisconsin

Median salary
$65,850
Mean salary
$65,570
Employment
2,970
Location quotient
2.84
Jobs per 1,000
1.0
COL-adjusted median
$69,982
Regional Price Parity
94.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tool And Die Makers page for Wisconsin →

Tool And Die Makers

Maine

Median salary
$76,500
Mean salary
$71,610
Employment
70
Location quotient
0.31
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$78,825
Regional Price Parity
97.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tool And Die Makers page for Maine →

Related pages

Keep digging into tool and die makers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.