Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Traffic Technicians Salary: Georgia vs California

Traffic Technicians earn a median of $52,720 in Georgia and $80,570 in California. That is a nominal gap of $27,850 (-34.6%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$52,720
Georgia median
$54,750 after COL
$80,570
California median
$72,769 after COL
-34.6%
Nominal gap
California leads
-24.8%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $27,850 more per year than Georgia for traffic technicians, a gap of +34.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $18,020 of extra purchasing power (+24.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for traffic technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Traffic Technicians

Georgia

Median salary
$52,720
Mean salary
$56,860
Employment
290
Location quotient
1.19
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$54,750
Regional Price Parity
96.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Traffic Technicians page for Georgia →

Traffic Technicians

California

Median salary
$80,570
Mean salary
$75,260
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$72,769
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Traffic Technicians page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into traffic technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.