Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Transit And Railroad Police Salary: California vs Missouri

Transit And Railroad Police earn a median of $109,810 in California and $68,640 in Missouri. That is a nominal gap of $41,170 (+60.0%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$109,810
California median
$99,178 after COL
$68,640
Missouri median
$75,581 after COL
+60.0%
Nominal gap
California leads
+31.2%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $41,170 more per year than Missouri for transit and railroad police, a gap of +60.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $23,598 of extra purchasing power (+31.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for transit and railroad police in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Transit And Railroad Police

California

Median salary
$109,810
Mean salary
$100,240
Employment
100
Location quotient
0.30
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$99,178
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Transit And Railroad Police page for California →

Transit And Railroad Police

Missouri

Median salary
$68,640
Mean salary
$71,420
Employment
80
Location quotient
1.40
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$75,581
Regional Price Parity
90.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Transit And Railroad Police page for Missouri →

Related pages

Keep digging into transit and railroad police from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.