Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Transportation Workers, All Other Salary: New Mexico vs Washington

Transportation Workers, All Other earn a median of $34,670 in New Mexico and $63,400 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $28,730 (-45.3%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$34,670
New Mexico median
$37,598 after COL
$63,400
Washington median
$59,245 after COL
-45.3%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-36.5%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $28,730 more per year than New Mexico for transportation workers, all other, a gap of +45.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $21,647 of extra purchasing power (+36.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for transportation workers, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Transportation Workers, All Other

New Mexico

Median salary
$34,670
Mean salary
$33,180
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$37,598
Regional Price Parity
92.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Transportation Workers, All Other page for New Mexico →

Transportation Workers, All Other

Washington

Median salary
$63,400
Mean salary
$60,410
Employment
90
Location quotient
0.35
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$59,245
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Transportation Workers, All Other page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into transportation workers, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.