Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Travel Agents Salary: California vs New Jersey

Travel Agents earn a median of $48,540 in California and $59,640 in New Jersey. That is a nominal gap of $11,100 (-18.6%), with New Jersey paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$48,540
California median
$43,840 after COL
$59,640
New Jersey median
$54,814 after COL
-18.6%
Nominal gap
New Jersey leads
-20.0%
Adjusted gap
New Jersey leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Jersey pays $11,100 more per year than California for travel agents, a gap of +18.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Jersey still comes out ahead, with roughly $10,973 of extra purchasing power (+20.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for travel agents in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Travel Agents

California

Median salary
$48,540
Mean salary
$54,650
Employment
5,780
Location quotient
0.83
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$43,840
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Travel Agents page for California →

Travel Agents

New Jersey

Median salary
$59,640
Mean salary
$60,630
Employment
1,470
Location quotient
0.90
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$54,814
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Travel Agents page for New Jersey →

Related pages

Keep digging into travel agents from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.