Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Tree Trimmers And Pruners Salary: Vermont vs Oregon

Tree Trimmers And Pruners earn a median of $60,320 in Vermont and $63,290 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $2,970 (-4.7%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$60,320
Vermont median
$61,577 after COL
$63,290
Oregon median
$61,232 after COL
-4.7%
Nominal gap
Oregon leads
+0.6%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oregon pays $2,970 more per year than Vermont for tree trimmers and pruners, a gap of +4.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Vermont actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $345 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.6% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tree trimmers and pruners in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tree Trimmers And Pruners

Vermont

Median salary
$60,320
Mean salary
$59,620
Employment
330
Location quotient
3.49
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$61,577
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tree Trimmers And Pruners page for Vermont →

Tree Trimmers And Pruners

Oregon

Median salary
$63,290
Mean salary
$68,940
Employment
1,180
Location quotient
1.94
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$61,232
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tree Trimmers And Pruners page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into tree trimmers and pruners from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.