Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Tutors Salary: Ohio vs Rhode Island

Tutors earn a median of $44,640 in Ohio and $59,340 in Rhode Island. That is a nominal gap of $14,700 (-24.8%), with Rhode Island paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$44,640
Ohio median
$48,117 after COL
$59,340
Rhode Island median
$58,017 after COL
-24.8%
Nominal gap
Rhode Island leads
-17.1%
Adjusted gap
Rhode Island leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Rhode Island pays $14,700 more per year than Ohio for tutors, a gap of +24.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Rhode Island still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,900 of extra purchasing power (+17.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for tutors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Tutors

Ohio

Median salary
$44,640
Mean salary
$48,510
Employment
7,120
Location quotient
1.14
Jobs per 1,000
1.3
COL-adjusted median
$48,117
Regional Price Parity
92.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tutors page for Ohio →

Tutors

Rhode Island

Median salary
$59,340
Mean salary
$65,580
Employment
340
Location quotient
0.61
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$58,017
Regional Price Parity
102.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Tutors page for Rhode Island →

Related pages

Keep digging into tutors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.