Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Urban And Regional Planners Salary: Hawaii vs Connecticut

Urban And Regional Planners earn a median of $80,170 in Hawaii and $94,960 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $14,790 (-15.6%), with Connecticut paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$80,170
Hawaii median
$72,914 after COL
$94,960
Connecticut median
$91,651 after COL
-15.6%
Nominal gap
Connecticut leads
-20.4%
Adjusted gap
Connecticut leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Connecticut pays $14,790 more per year than Hawaii for urban and regional planners, a gap of +15.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Connecticut still comes out ahead, with roughly $18,737 of extra purchasing power (+20.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for urban and regional planners in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Urban And Regional Planners

Hawaii

Median salary
$80,170
Mean salary
$82,190
Employment
450
Location quotient
2.60
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$72,914
Regional Price Parity
110.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Urban And Regional Planners page for Hawaii →

Urban And Regional Planners

Connecticut

Median salary
$94,960
Mean salary
$96,830
Employment
380
Location quotient
0.82
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$91,651
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Urban And Regional Planners page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into urban and regional planners from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.