Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Urban And Regional Planners Salary: Oregon vs New York

Urban And Regional Planners earn a median of $92,400 in Oregon and $94,740 in New York. That is a nominal gap of $2,340 (-2.5%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$92,400
Oregon median
$89,395 after COL
$94,740
New York median
$87,786 after COL
-2.5%
Nominal gap
New York leads
+1.8%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $2,340 more per year than Oregon for urban and regional planners, a gap of +2.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Oregon actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,609 more in national-price-level terms (a +1.8% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for urban and regional planners in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Urban And Regional Planners

Oregon

Median salary
$92,400
Mean salary
$94,220
Employment
1,100
Location quotient
2.01
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$89,395
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Urban And Regional Planners page for Oregon →

Urban And Regional Planners

New York

Median salary
$94,740
Mean salary
$100,040
Employment
2,100
Location quotient
0.79
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$87,786
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Urban And Regional Planners page for New York →

Related pages

Keep digging into urban and regional planners from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.