Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Wellhead Pumpers Salary: Montana vs Arkansas

Wellhead Pumpers earn a median of $61,780 in Montana and $80,930 in Arkansas. That is a nominal gap of $19,150 (-23.7%), with Arkansas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$61,780
Montana median
$65,276 after COL
$80,930
Arkansas median
$93,090 after COL
-23.7%
Nominal gap
Arkansas leads
-29.9%
Adjusted gap
Arkansas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Arkansas pays $19,150 more per year than Montana for wellhead pumpers, a gap of +23.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Arkansas still comes out ahead, with roughly $27,815 of extra purchasing power (+29.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for wellhead pumpers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Wellhead Pumpers

Montana

Median salary
$61,780
Mean salary
$65,240
Employment
130
Location quotient
2.20
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$65,276
Regional Price Parity
94.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Wellhead Pumpers page for Montana →

Wellhead Pumpers

Arkansas

Median salary
$80,930
Mean salary
$71,510
Employment
110
Location quotient
0.75
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$93,090
Regional Price Parity
86.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Wellhead Pumpers page for Arkansas →

Related pages

Keep digging into wellhead pumpers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.