Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Word Processors And Typists Salary: Wisconsin vs Alaska

Word Processors And Typists earn a median of $47,130 in Wisconsin and $53,640 in Alaska. That is a nominal gap of $6,510 (-12.1%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$47,130
Wisconsin median
$50,088 after COL
$53,640
Alaska median
$52,404 after COL
-12.1%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
-4.4%
Adjusted gap
Alaska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $6,510 more per year than Wisconsin for word processors and typists, a gap of +12.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alaska still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,316 of extra purchasing power (+4.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for word processors and typists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Word Processors And Typists

Wisconsin

Median salary
$47,130
Mean salary
$46,000
Employment
290
Location quotient
0.42
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$50,088
Regional Price Parity
94.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Word Processors And Typists page for Wisconsin →

Word Processors And Typists

Alaska

Median salary
$53,640
Mean salary
$54,470
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.49
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$52,404
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Word Processors And Typists page for Alaska →

Related pages

Keep digging into word processors and typists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.