Skip to content
uswages .org

Accountants And Auditors Salary: California vs Connecticut

Accountants And Auditors earn a median of $97,050 in California and $97,550 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $500 (-0.5%), with Connecticut paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$97,050
California median
$87,654 after COL
$97,550
Connecticut median
$94,151 after COL
-0.5%
Nominal gap
Connecticut leads
-6.9%
Adjusted gap
Connecticut leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Connecticut pays $500 more per year than California for accountants and auditors, a gap of +0.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Connecticut still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,498 of extra purchasing power (+6.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for accountants and auditors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Accountants And Auditors

California

Median salary
$97,050
Mean salary
$103,760
Employment
175,360
Location quotient
1.03
Jobs per 1,000
9.6
COL-adjusted median
$87,654
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Accountants And Auditors page for California →

Accountants And Auditors

Connecticut

Median salary
$97,550
Mean salary
$101,810
Employment
16,770
Location quotient
1.06
Jobs per 1,000
9.9
COL-adjusted median
$94,151
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Accountants And Auditors page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into accountants and auditors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.