Skip to content
uswages .org

Accountants And Auditors Salary: Washington vs California

Accountants And Auditors earn a median of $96,550 in Washington and $97,050 in California. That is a nominal gap of $500 (-0.5%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$96,550
Washington median
$90,223 after COL
$97,050
California median
$87,654 after COL
-0.5%
Nominal gap
California leads
+2.9%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $500 more per year than Washington for accountants and auditors, a gap of +0.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Washington actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,569 more in national-price-level terms (a +2.9% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for accountants and auditors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Accountants And Auditors

Washington

Median salary
$96,550
Mean salary
$102,700
Employment
34,740
Location quotient
1.05
Jobs per 1,000
9.8
COL-adjusted median
$90,223
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Accountants And Auditors page for Washington →

Accountants And Auditors

California

Median salary
$97,050
Mean salary
$103,760
Employment
175,360
Location quotient
1.03
Jobs per 1,000
9.6
COL-adjusted median
$87,654
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Accountants And Auditors page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into accountants and auditors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.