Skip to content
uswages .org

Advertising Sales Agents Salary: Massachusetts vs New York

Advertising Sales Agents earn a median of $80,500 in Massachusetts and $98,360 in New York. That is a nominal gap of $17,860 (-18.2%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$80,500
Massachusetts median
$76,118 after COL
$98,360
New York median
$91,141 after COL
-18.2%
Nominal gap
New York leads
-16.5%
Adjusted gap
New York leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $17,860 more per year than Massachusetts for advertising sales agents, a gap of +18.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New York still comes out ahead, with roughly $15,023 of extra purchasing power (+16.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for advertising sales agents in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Advertising Sales Agents

Massachusetts

Median salary
$80,500
Mean salary
$90,640
Employment
1,480
Location quotient
0.69
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$76,118
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Advertising Sales Agents page for Massachusetts →

Advertising Sales Agents

New York

Median salary
$98,360
Mean salary
$111,380
Employment
13,570
Location quotient
2.37
Jobs per 1,000
1.4
COL-adjusted median
$91,141
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Advertising Sales Agents page for New York →

Related pages

Keep digging into advertising sales agents from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.