Skip to content
uswages .org

Aerospace Engineers Salary: Alabama vs District of Columbia

Aerospace Engineers earn a median of $127,540 in Alabama and $157,600 in District of Columbia. That is a nominal gap of $30,060 (-19.1%), with District of Columbia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$127,540
Alabama median
$143,589 after COL
$157,600
District of Columbia median
$143,402 after COL
-19.1%
Nominal gap
District of Columbia leads
+0.1%
Adjusted gap
Alabama leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, District of Columbia pays $30,060 more per year than Alabama for aerospace engineers, a gap of +19.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Alabama actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $187 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.1% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for aerospace engineers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Aerospace Engineers

Alabama

Median salary
$127,540
Mean salary
$131,910
Employment
5,820
Location quotient
6.32
Jobs per 1,000
2.8
COL-adjusted median
$143,589
Regional Price Parity
88.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Aerospace Engineers page for Alabama →

Aerospace Engineers

District of Columbia

Median salary
$157,600
Mean salary
$154,410
Employment
290
Location quotient
0.96
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$143,402
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Aerospace Engineers page for District of Columbia →

Related pages

Keep digging into aerospace engineers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.