Skip to content
uswages .org

Aerospace Engineers Salary: California vs Massachusetts

Aerospace Engineers earn a median of $157,620 in California and $149,470 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $8,150 (+5.5%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$157,620
California median
$142,359 after COL
$149,470
Massachusetts median
$141,333 after COL
+5.5%
Nominal gap
California leads
+0.7%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $8,150 more per year than Massachusetts for aerospace engineers, a gap of +5.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $1,026 of extra purchasing power (+0.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for aerospace engineers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Aerospace Engineers

California

Median salary
$157,620
Mean salary
$159,960
Employment
9,170
Location quotient
1.16
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$142,359
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Aerospace Engineers page for California →

Aerospace Engineers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$149,470
Mean salary
$145,810
Employment
990
Location quotient
0.63
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$141,333
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Aerospace Engineers page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into aerospace engineers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.