Skip to content
uswages .org

Agricultural Engineers Salary: Indiana vs Mississippi

Agricultural Engineers earn a median of $94,730 in Indiana and $91,560 in Mississippi. That is a nominal gap of $3,170 (+3.5%), with Indiana paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$94,730
Indiana median
$101,501 after COL
$91,560
Mississippi median
$105,298 after COL
+3.5%
Nominal gap
Indiana leads
-3.6%
Adjusted gap
Mississippi leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Indiana pays $3,170 more per year than Mississippi for agricultural engineers, a gap of +3.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Mississippi actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $3,797 more in national-price-level terms (a +3.6% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for agricultural engineers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Agricultural Engineers

Indiana

Median salary
$94,730
Mean salary
$100,520
Employment
150
Location quotient
5.01
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$101,501
Regional Price Parity
93.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Agricultural Engineers page for Indiana →

Agricultural Engineers

Mississippi

Median salary
$91,560
Mean salary
$98,930
Employment
40
Location quotient
3.66
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$105,298
Regional Price Parity
87.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Agricultural Engineers page for Mississippi →

Related pages

Keep digging into agricultural engineers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.