Skip to content
uswages .org

Agricultural Engineers Salary: Minnesota vs Colorado

Agricultural Engineers earn a median of $115,940 in Minnesota and $88,650 in Colorado. That is a nominal gap of $27,290 (+30.8%), with Minnesota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$115,940
Minnesota median
$117,561 after COL
$88,650
Colorado median
$86,025 after COL
+30.8%
Nominal gap
Minnesota leads
+36.7%
Adjusted gap
Minnesota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Minnesota pays $27,290 more per year than Colorado for agricultural engineers, a gap of +30.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Minnesota still comes out ahead, with roughly $31,537 of extra purchasing power (+36.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for agricultural engineers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Agricultural Engineers

Minnesota

Median salary
$115,940
Mean salary
$112,050
Employment
60
Location quotient
1.98
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$117,561
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Agricultural Engineers page for Minnesota →

Agricultural Engineers

Colorado

Median salary
$88,650
Mean salary
$93,790
Employment
30
Location quotient
1.17
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$86,025
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Agricultural Engineers page for Colorado →

Related pages

Keep digging into agricultural engineers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.