Skip to content
uswages .org

Agricultural Inspectors Salary: New York vs Minnesota

Agricultural Inspectors earn a median of $73,920 in New York and $77,150 in Minnesota. That is a nominal gap of $3,230 (-4.2%), with Minnesota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$73,920
New York median
$68,495 after COL
$77,150
Minnesota median
$78,229 after COL
-4.2%
Nominal gap
Minnesota leads
-12.4%
Adjusted gap
Minnesota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Minnesota pays $3,230 more per year than New York for agricultural inspectors, a gap of +4.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Minnesota still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,734 of extra purchasing power (+12.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for agricultural inspectors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Agricultural Inspectors

New York

Median salary
$73,920
Mean salary
$72,980
Employment
340
Location quotient
0.38
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$68,495
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Agricultural Inspectors page for New York →

Agricultural Inspectors

Minnesota

Median salary
$77,150
Mean salary
$75,380
Employment
180
Location quotient
0.67
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$78,229
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Agricultural Inspectors page for Minnesota →

Related pages

Keep digging into agricultural inspectors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.