Skip to content
uswages .org

Agricultural Workers, All Other Salary: Ohio vs Montana

Agricultural Workers, All Other earn a median of $43,540 in Ohio and $42,130 in Montana. That is a nominal gap of $1,410 (+3.3%), with Ohio paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$43,540
Ohio median
$46,931 after COL
$42,130
Montana median
$44,514 after COL
+3.3%
Nominal gap
Ohio leads
+5.4%
Adjusted gap
Ohio leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Ohio pays $1,410 more per year than Montana for agricultural workers, all other, a gap of +3.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Ohio still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,418 of extra purchasing power (+5.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for agricultural workers, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Agricultural Workers, All Other

Ohio

Median salary
$43,540
Mean salary
$50,960
Employment
50
Location quotient
0.41
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$46,931
Regional Price Parity
92.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Agricultural Workers, All Other page for Ohio →

Agricultural Workers, All Other

Montana

Median salary
$42,130
Mean salary
$43,950
Employment
80
Location quotient
6.90
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$44,514
Regional Price Parity
94.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Agricultural Workers, All Other page for Montana →

Related pages

Keep digging into agricultural workers, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.