Skip to content
uswages .org

Animal Breeders Salary: South Dakota vs Texas

Animal Breeders earn a median of $44,850 in South Dakota and $48,410 in Texas. That is a nominal gap of $3,560 (-7.4%), with Texas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$44,850
South Dakota median
$50,629 after COL
$48,410
Texas median
$49,878 after COL
-7.4%
Nominal gap
Texas leads
+1.5%
Adjusted gap
South Dakota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Texas pays $3,560 more per year than South Dakota for animal breeders, a gap of +7.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. South Dakota actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $751 more in national-price-level terms (a +1.5% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for animal breeders in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Animal Breeders

South Dakota

Median salary
$44,850
Mean salary
$44,170
Employment
40
Location quotient
10.72
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$50,629
Regional Price Parity
88.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Breeders page for South Dakota →

Animal Breeders

Texas

Median salary
$48,410
Mean salary
$52,370
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.46
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$49,878
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Breeders page for Texas →

Related pages

Keep digging into animal breeders from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.