Skip to content
uswages .org

Animal Breeders Salary: Texas vs Wisconsin

Animal Breeders earn a median of $48,410 in Texas and $51,130 in Wisconsin. That is a nominal gap of $2,720 (-5.3%), with Wisconsin paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$48,410
Texas median
$49,878 after COL
$51,130
Wisconsin median
$54,339 after COL
-5.3%
Nominal gap
Wisconsin leads
-8.2%
Adjusted gap
Wisconsin leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Wisconsin pays $2,720 more per year than Texas for animal breeders, a gap of +5.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Wisconsin still comes out ahead, with roughly $4,461 of extra purchasing power (+8.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for animal breeders in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Animal Breeders

Texas

Median salary
$48,410
Mean salary
$52,370
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.46
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$49,878
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Breeders page for Texas →

Animal Breeders

Wisconsin

Median salary
$51,130
Mean salary
$49,890
Employment
40
Location quotient
1.63
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$54,339
Regional Price Parity
94.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Breeders page for Wisconsin →

Related pages

Keep digging into animal breeders from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.