Skip to content
uswages .org

Animal Scientists Salary: Minnesota vs Texas

Animal Scientists earn a median of $88,640 in Minnesota and $132,830 in Texas. That is a nominal gap of $44,190 (-33.3%), with Texas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$88,640
Minnesota median
$89,879 after COL
$132,830
Texas median
$136,858 after COL
-33.3%
Nominal gap
Texas leads
-34.3%
Adjusted gap
Texas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Texas pays $44,190 more per year than Minnesota for animal scientists, a gap of +33.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Texas still comes out ahead, with roughly $46,978 of extra purchasing power (+34.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for animal scientists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Animal Scientists

Minnesota

Median salary
$88,640
Mean salary
$114,380
Employment
100
Location quotient
1.70
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$89,879
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Scientists page for Minnesota →

Animal Scientists

Texas

Median salary
$132,830
Mean salary
$129,960
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.13
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$136,858
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Scientists page for Texas →

Related pages

Keep digging into animal scientists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.