Skip to content
uswages .org

Animal Scientists Salary: Nebraska vs Washington

Animal Scientists earn a median of $55,300 in Nebraska and $83,160 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $27,860 (-33.5%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$55,300
Nebraska median
$61,374 after COL
$83,160
Washington median
$77,710 after COL
-33.5%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-21.0%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $27,860 more per year than Nebraska for animal scientists, a gap of +33.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $16,336 of extra purchasing power (+21.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for animal scientists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Animal Scientists

Nebraska

Median salary
$55,300
Mean salary
$71,280
Employment
210
Location quotient
10.49
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$61,374
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Scientists page for Nebraska →

Animal Scientists

Washington

Median salary
$83,160
Mean salary
$86,440
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.50
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$77,710
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Scientists page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into animal scientists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.