Skip to content
uswages .org

Animal Trainers Salary: Alabama vs Oregon

Animal Trainers earn a median of $55,700 in Alabama and $55,520 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $180 (+0.3%), with Alabama paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$55,700
Alabama median
$62,709 after COL
$55,520
Oregon median
$53,715 after COL
+0.3%
Nominal gap
Alabama leads
+16.7%
Adjusted gap
Alabama leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alabama pays $180 more per year than Oregon for animal trainers, a gap of +0.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alabama still comes out ahead, with roughly $8,994 of extra purchasing power (+16.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for animal trainers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Animal Trainers

Alabama

Median salary
$55,700
Mean salary
$55,600
Employment
170
Location quotient
0.67
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$62,709
Regional Price Parity
88.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Trainers page for Alabama →

Animal Trainers

Oregon

Median salary
$55,520
Mean salary
$57,330
Employment
140
Location quotient
0.60
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$53,715
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Trainers page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into animal trainers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.