Skip to content
uswages .org

Animal Trainers Salary: Virginia vs California

Animal Trainers earn a median of $62,960 in Virginia and $49,060 in California. That is a nominal gap of $13,900 (+28.3%), with Virginia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$62,960
Virginia median
$62,273 after COL
$49,060
California median
$44,310 after COL
+28.3%
Nominal gap
Virginia leads
+40.5%
Adjusted gap
Virginia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Virginia pays $13,900 more per year than California for animal trainers, a gap of +28.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Virginia still comes out ahead, with roughly $17,963 of extra purchasing power (+40.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for animal trainers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Animal Trainers

Virginia

Median salary
$62,960
Mean salary
$74,870
Employment
720
Location quotient
1.45
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$62,273
Regional Price Parity
101.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Trainers page for Virginia →

Animal Trainers

California

Median salary
$49,060
Mean salary
$55,570
Employment
2,270
Location quotient
1.03
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$44,310
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Animal Trainers page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into animal trainers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.