Skip to content
uswages .org

Art Directors Salary: New Hampshire vs California

Art Directors earn a median of $132,000 in New Hampshire and $137,780 in California. That is a nominal gap of $5,780 (-4.2%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$132,000
New Hampshire median
$126,722 after COL
$137,780
California median
$124,440 after COL
-4.2%
Nominal gap
California leads
+1.8%
Adjusted gap
New Hampshire leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $5,780 more per year than New Hampshire for art directors, a gap of +4.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. New Hampshire actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,282 more in national-price-level terms (a +1.8% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for art directors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Art Directors

New Hampshire

Median salary
$132,000
Mean salary
$117,230
Employment
160
Location quotient
0.70
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$126,722
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Art Directors page for New Hampshire →

Art Directors

California

Median salary
$137,780
Mean salary
$156,060
Employment
12,430
Location quotient
2.00
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$124,440
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Art Directors page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into art directors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.