Skip to content
uswages .org

Art Directors Salary: Oregon vs Vermont

Art Directors earn a median of $133,840 in Oregon and $129,260 in Vermont. That is a nominal gap of $4,580 (+3.5%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$133,840
Oregon median
$129,488 after COL
$129,260
Vermont median
$131,955 after COL
+3.5%
Nominal gap
Oregon leads
-1.9%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oregon pays $4,580 more per year than Vermont for art directors, a gap of +3.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Vermont actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,467 more in national-price-level terms (a +1.9% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for art directors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Art Directors

Oregon

Median salary
$133,840
Mean salary
$152,490
Employment
1,040
Location quotient
1.55
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$129,488
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Art Directors page for Oregon →

Art Directors

Vermont

Median salary
$129,260
Mean salary
$122,490
Employment
80
Location quotient
0.82
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$131,955
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Art Directors page for Vermont →

Related pages

Keep digging into art directors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.