Skip to content
uswages .org

Athletes And Sports Competitors Salary: California vs Nevada

Athletes And Sports Competitors earn a median of $79,040 in California and $119,780 in Nevada. That is a nominal gap of $40,740 (-34.0%), with Nevada paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$79,040
California median
$71,387 after COL
$119,780
Nevada median
$119,805 after COL
-34.0%
Nominal gap
Nevada leads
-40.4%
Adjusted gap
Nevada leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Nevada pays $40,740 more per year than California for athletes and sports competitors, a gap of +34.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Nevada still comes out ahead, with roughly $48,418 of extra purchasing power (+40.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for athletes and sports competitors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Athletes And Sports Competitors

California

Median salary
$79,040
Mean salary
$294,080
Employment
830
Location quotient
0.47
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$71,387
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Athletes And Sports Competitors page for California →

Athletes And Sports Competitors

Nevada

Median salary
$119,780
Mean salary
$101,880
Employment
160
Location quotient
1.09
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$119,805
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Athletes And Sports Competitors page for Nevada →

Related pages

Keep digging into athletes and sports competitors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.