Skip to content
uswages .org

Athletes And Sports Competitors Salary: Florida vs California

Athletes And Sports Competitors earn a median of $78,610 in Florida and $79,040 in California. That is a nominal gap of $430 (-0.5%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$78,610
Florida median
$76,015 after COL
$79,040
California median
$71,387 after COL
-0.5%
Nominal gap
California leads
+6.5%
Adjusted gap
Florida leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $430 more per year than Florida for athletes and sports competitors, a gap of +0.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Florida actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $4,628 more in national-price-level terms (a +6.5% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for athletes and sports competitors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Athletes And Sports Competitors

Florida

Median salary
$78,610
Mean salary
$93,280
Employment
1,360
Location quotient
1.41
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$76,015
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Athletes And Sports Competitors page for Florida →

Athletes And Sports Competitors

California

Median salary
$79,040
Mean salary
$294,080
Employment
830
Location quotient
0.47
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$71,387
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Athletes And Sports Competitors page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into athletes and sports competitors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.