Skip to content
uswages .org

Athletes And Sports Competitors Salary: Utah vs Texas

Athletes And Sports Competitors earn a median of $122,800 in Utah and $80,510 in Texas. That is a nominal gap of $42,290 (+52.5%), with Utah paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$122,800
Utah median
$124,211 after COL
$80,510
Texas median
$82,951 after COL
+52.5%
Nominal gap
Utah leads
+49.7%
Adjusted gap
Utah leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Utah pays $42,290 more per year than Texas for athletes and sports competitors, a gap of +52.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Utah still comes out ahead, with roughly $41,260 of extra purchasing power (+49.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for athletes and sports competitors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Athletes And Sports Competitors

Utah

Median salary
$122,800
Mean salary
$229,290
Employment
340
Location quotient
2.00
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$124,211
Regional Price Parity
98.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Athletes And Sports Competitors page for Utah →

Athletes And Sports Competitors

Texas

Median salary
$80,510
Mean salary
$310,180
Employment
1,840
Location quotient
1.35
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$82,951
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Athletes And Sports Competitors page for Texas →

Related pages

Keep digging into athletes and sports competitors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.