Skip to content
uswages .org

Atmospheric And Space Scientists Salary: Idaho vs Florida

Atmospheric And Space Scientists earn a median of $119,430 in Idaho and $115,960 in Florida. That is a nominal gap of $3,470 (+3.0%), with Idaho paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$119,430
Idaho median
$125,065 after COL
$115,960
Florida median
$112,132 after COL
+3.0%
Nominal gap
Idaho leads
+11.5%
Adjusted gap
Idaho leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Idaho pays $3,470 more per year than Florida for atmospheric and space scientists, a gap of +3.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Idaho still comes out ahead, with roughly $12,934 of extra purchasing power (+11.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for atmospheric and space scientists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Atmospheric And Space Scientists

Idaho

Median salary
$119,430
Mean salary
$113,340
Employment
50
Location quotient
0.96
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$125,065
Regional Price Parity
95.5%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Atmospheric And Space Scientists page for Idaho →

Atmospheric And Space Scientists

Florida

Median salary
$115,960
Mean salary
$114,740
Employment
270
Location quotient
0.43
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$112,132
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Atmospheric And Space Scientists page for Florida →

Related pages

Keep digging into atmospheric and space scientists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.