Skip to content
uswages .org

Atmospheric And Space Scientists Salary: New Hampshire vs California

Atmospheric And Space Scientists earn a median of $42,820 in New Hampshire and $124,920 in California. That is a nominal gap of $82,100 (-65.7%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$42,820
New Hampshire median
$41,108 after COL
$124,920
California median
$112,825 after COL
-65.7%
Nominal gap
California leads
-63.6%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $82,100 more per year than New Hampshire for atmospheric and space scientists, a gap of +65.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $71,717 of extra purchasing power (+63.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for atmospheric and space scientists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Atmospheric And Space Scientists

New Hampshire

Median salary
$42,820
Mean salary
$52,790
Employment
130
Location quotient
3.00
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$41,108
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Atmospheric And Space Scientists page for New Hampshire →

Atmospheric And Space Scientists

California

Median salary
$124,920
Mean salary
$127,330
Employment
510
Location quotient
0.43
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$112,825
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Atmospheric And Space Scientists page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into atmospheric and space scientists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.