Skip to content
uswages .org

Audio And Video Technicians Salary: California vs Rhode Island

Audio And Video Technicians earn a median of $64,620 in California and $64,070 in Rhode Island. That is a nominal gap of $550 (+0.9%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$64,620
California median
$58,363 after COL
$64,070
Rhode Island median
$62,642 after COL
+0.9%
Nominal gap
California leads
-6.8%
Adjusted gap
Rhode Island leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $550 more per year than Rhode Island for audio and video technicians, a gap of +0.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Rhode Island actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $4,278 more in national-price-level terms (a +6.8% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for audio and video technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Audio And Video Technicians

California

Median salary
$64,620
Mean salary
$73,150
Employment
9,280
Location quotient
1.13
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$58,363
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Audio And Video Technicians page for California →

Audio And Video Technicians

Rhode Island

Median salary
$64,070
Mean salary
$64,270
Employment
150
Location quotient
0.64
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$62,642
Regional Price Parity
102.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Audio And Video Technicians page for Rhode Island →

Related pages

Keep digging into audio and video technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.