Skip to content
uswages .org

Baggage Porters And Bellhops Salary: California vs New Jersey

Baggage Porters And Bellhops earn a median of $40,040 in California and $41,080 in New Jersey. That is a nominal gap of $1,040 (-2.5%), with New Jersey paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$40,040
California median
$36,163 after COL
$41,080
New Jersey median
$37,756 after COL
-2.5%
Nominal gap
New Jersey leads
-4.2%
Adjusted gap
New Jersey leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Jersey pays $1,040 more per year than California for baggage porters and bellhops, a gap of +2.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Jersey still comes out ahead, with roughly $1,592 of extra purchasing power (+4.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for baggage porters and bellhops in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Baggage Porters And Bellhops

California

Median salary
$40,040
Mean salary
$43,040
Employment
2,940
Location quotient
0.88
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$36,163
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Baggage Porters And Bellhops page for California →

Baggage Porters And Bellhops

New Jersey

Median salary
$41,080
Mean salary
$39,480
Employment
570
Location quotient
0.73
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$37,756
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Baggage Porters And Bellhops page for New Jersey →

Related pages

Keep digging into baggage porters and bellhops from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.