Skip to content
uswages .org

Bartenders Salary: Vermont vs District of Columbia

Bartenders earn a median of $45,450 in Vermont and $53,920 in District of Columbia. That is a nominal gap of $8,470 (-15.7%), with District of Columbia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$45,450
Vermont median
$46,397 after COL
$53,920
District of Columbia median
$49,062 after COL
-15.7%
Nominal gap
District of Columbia leads
-5.4%
Adjusted gap
District of Columbia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, District of Columbia pays $8,470 more per year than Vermont for bartenders, a gap of +15.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, District of Columbia still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,665 of extra purchasing power (+5.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for bartenders in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Bartenders

Vermont

Median salary
$45,450
Mean salary
$51,780
Employment
2,080
Location quotient
1.40
Jobs per 1,000
6.8
COL-adjusted median
$46,397
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Bartenders page for Vermont →

Bartenders

District of Columbia

Median salary
$53,920
Mean salary
$59,210
Employment
5,760
Location quotient
1.69
Jobs per 1,000
8.2
COL-adjusted median
$49,062
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Bartenders page for District of Columbia →

Related pages

Keep digging into bartenders from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.