Skip to content
uswages .org

Bartenders Salary: Washington vs District of Columbia

Bartenders earn a median of $55,830 in Washington and $53,920 in District of Columbia. That is a nominal gap of $1,910 (+3.5%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$55,830
Washington median
$52,171 after COL
$53,920
District of Columbia median
$49,062 after COL
+3.5%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+6.3%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $1,910 more per year than District of Columbia for bartenders, a gap of +3.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $3,109 of extra purchasing power (+6.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for bartenders in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Bartenders

Washington

Median salary
$55,830
Mean salary
$60,010
Employment
16,800
Location quotient
0.97
Jobs per 1,000
4.7
COL-adjusted median
$52,171
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Bartenders page for Washington →

Bartenders

District of Columbia

Median salary
$53,920
Mean salary
$59,210
Employment
5,760
Location quotient
1.69
Jobs per 1,000
8.2
COL-adjusted median
$49,062
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Bartenders page for District of Columbia →

Related pages

Keep digging into bartenders from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.