Skip to content
uswages .org

Brokerage Clerks Salary: Washington vs Vermont

Brokerage Clerks earn a median of $73,120 in Washington and $78,200 in Vermont. That is a nominal gap of $5,080 (-6.5%), with Vermont paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$73,120
Washington median
$68,328 after COL
$78,200
Vermont median
$79,830 after COL
-6.5%
Nominal gap
Vermont leads
-14.4%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Vermont pays $5,080 more per year than Washington for brokerage clerks, a gap of +6.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Vermont still comes out ahead, with roughly $11,502 of extra purchasing power (+14.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for brokerage clerks in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Brokerage Clerks

Washington

Median salary
$73,120
Mean salary
$78,720
Employment
140
Location quotient
0.17
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$68,328
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Brokerage Clerks page for Washington →

Brokerage Clerks

Vermont

Median salary
$78,200
Mean salary
$79,450
Employment
30
Location quotient
0.45
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$79,830
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Brokerage Clerks page for Vermont →

Related pages

Keep digging into brokerage clerks from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.